So much Rule 18

 Rule 18, for those of you not familiar with this blog, advises dommes to "Try to avoid sessions with clients who have really specific fetishes and can't get off unless it is done exactly right."   Obviously, being directed at (or 'humbly proffered to') dommes, it is more what you'd call a 'guideline' than an actual rule*.  Nonetheless, it seems to me a useful principle and as I wank work my way around the Internet I am forcibly struck by how very often it is flouted**.

Consider the following, for example:

 

He's been banned from every Michelin dealership in Southern England.

 

 

 

They have to be mainly yellow, but not plain yellow.  Tricky, unless you know where to get them.  You've got to admit, though: done correctly, it's startlingly erotic.

"Where oh where can that naughty slave of mine have got to? Is he under this table?  No!  Is he hiding behind the ceramic pot?  No!  Hmmm... I can't seem to find him anywhere.  Heeheehee!  Wait...did I hear someone giggle?   I don't suppose he could be... inside the zebra, could he?  Could he? Yes!  Yes he could!"

That's a French ship of the line, probably a 74-gunner.  But the rigging's all wrong - a shame after she went to so much effort with everything else, but that's why we have Rule 18, right?

The worst of it is: this outfit is not the Rule 18 fetish.  It's what she has to wear to perform the Rule 18 fetish safely.  Not for the faint-hearted domme.***

 

Don't even ask.  Possibly the worst Rule 18 violation yet - that's all I'm saying.

* So why did I call it 'Rule 18' you might ask?  It's a good question and I will explain some time.****

** Yes: 'flouted' not 'flaunted', which would mean essentially the opposite in this context.  Editor Domme may be gone but standards must be maintained. 

*** I'll admit I haven't met many of those.  None at all, in fact.

**** Were you expecting a footnote referring to Pirates of the Caribbean, perhaps?

Rule 18

A while ago I published one of my helpful posts aimed at novice dommes and subs, drawing upon my years of experience to give guidance - top tips, so to speak - so the new generation can avoid the mistakes of its predecessors. 

Within that, I suggested what has become known - to me at least - as 'Servitor's Rule 18', namely:

 

 

Since then, I keep coming across* images online which can only cause me to think that no one reads this blog.  Rule 18 violations abound.  Here are a few - just a few - examples

 

 

CFEM play: Clothed Female, Exhibited Male.  Note, however, that most clients admitting to a fetish for 'exhibitionism' are unlikely to be seeking to be put in a glass case with a small type-written card explaining their provenance and archaeological significance. But for those that do: Rule 18 applies.

 

 

Eskimo play (more properly called Inuit play nowadays) is actually straightforward enough if you happen to own a punishment igloo and have access to dried seal meat. However, most clients request the domme to wear an outfit (not shown) that can be hot and uncomfortable, so this qualifies for Rule 18.

 

 

 

Servitor top tip: if the scene requires knowledge of industrial chemistry it's probably a Rule 18 violation.

 

 

 

Actually, this one's quite a turn-on for me.  Now where's my sonic?

 

 

 

Known in the business as 'Violet Beauregarde play', I believe.  Dommes attempting it are advised not to use pumps that can exceed the officially recommended pressure (and if not sure, should undertake the inflation in an open public space).

 

 

Ah, yes: 'Latex nun birdcage guy'.  My SO remembers sessioning with him. She still has the birdcage somewhere.

 

 

Rule 18... so very Rule 18.

 

NB: for anyone taking this all too seriously (a) you're reading the wrong blog, mate; (b) YKINMK-ETDAMTLN-BIRYKAAMKAFWT**.

 

* Note to self: remember to add feeble ejaculation-related pun down here. 

** Your kink is not my kink - except the dalek and maybe the latex nun - but I respect your kink and anyway my kinks are fucking weird too.