Sunday, October 9, 2022

Yes, Madam Minister


 

 

In the so-called 'real world' the new female PM of the United Kingdom is having a difficult start, having accidentally killed off a beloved monarch in her first week and then hurtling downhill from there. In a better-run parallel world, however, a newly-elected counterpart is getting on with some much-needed legislative reforms.  The email below reached me through a trans-dimensionoodly doohickey gizmo, so I thought I'd pass it on to you.

 

 

To: tjl@mmc.gov.fem
From: lhh@pmo.gov.fem
Subject: Draft Male Re-education legislation

 

Security classification: confidential policydev. Female eyes only.

Hi Tilly

Just passing on some drafting points for the MRA your department is preparing.  The PM asked her comms team for some advice and they’ve come up with the following. Anything you don’t agree with, just brief your Minister and she can bring it up in Thursday’s Cabinet. PM still absolutely committed to this: it’s the centrepiece of her programme.  Mostly just some language suggestions.

Main points from the comms girls:

  1. They didn’t like the name.  Male Re-education Act.  Not sure why, maybe same idea as not liking ‘Re-education Camp’, see below.  But this is the name we’ve been using since the election campaign, so ignore this one.  Anyway, it is going to be educational.    Very!  😉 

  2. Replace ‘sexist scum’ in Intro with ‘males with old-fashioned attitudes’.  And throughout.

  3. Similarly, in the background section remove the word ‘moronic’ from the stuff about patriarchal oppression and they suggest using ‘a healing process’ instead of ‘retribution’. Shame to tone down what I thought was an excellent section but the important thing is to get the law passed.  Then we can say and do what we like.

  4. In ‘Our proposals’ section use ‘meaningful exchange of views’ instead of ‘grinding the sexist opponents of female supremacy beneath our boots’.  I think I detect your Minister’s own hand (and boot!) in that one!  PM loved it, but probably has to go. 😊

  5. ‘Re-education camps’.  This is the big one: comms team just went on and on about totalitarian imagery, blah blah fascism.  They suggested ‘Nurturing Centres’ – excuse me while I vomit!  So, maybe this is something to discuss.  A quick brainstorm round the girls in the PMO came up with ‘Sexism Retraining Facilities’ (but it sounds like we’re training them to be better at sexism, which is the opposite of the point!), ‘Male Re-orientation Facilities’ (I quite liked that) and ‘Male Betterment Centres’ (bleah but at least it's not 'nurturing'). Welcome suggestions!

  6. Use ‘appropriate medical intervention’ for the c-word.  Actually, this is something you really should already have picked up on: a memo was sent around just after the election banning the word ‘c*str*tion’ or any direct synonyms in any official government communications.  (And on Twitter – maybe something you could remind your Minister about, hmmmm??  Again!??).

  7. Some of the budget line items: ‘restraints’, ‘cattle prods’, ‘whips’ etc could all be consolidated into one line reading ‘educational equipment’; 'enemas' and 'ice baths' into 'medical supplies' etc.  Plus, see point 6 above concerning some of the medical supplies, OK?  You know the ones I mean.

  8. NB: not a comms issue but just on the finances, the reviewers commented on how low the budget for inmate food is.  I had the same reaction: I divided the total by the expected number of inmates and I was a bit shocked.  Are you quite sure you can keep an adult male alive on this much?  I mean, we’re all in favour of saving taxpayers’ money, but we don’t want them dying of starvation.  Not many of them, anyway.  Just have another look.

  9. On the other hand, the budget for guards’ uniforms is astronomical!  We want them to look smart but the girls at HM Treasury are going to push back on this.  I understand this is because you plan to use high-quality leather designs and I'm sure they'll look fabulous - so just make sure they do, OK?  Goddess knows they should, for that kind of money! PM is probably OK to sign off, but you might want to kit out a couple of guards in demonstration uniforms and send them across to No 10 for the PM to take a look.  I suggest younger guards, preferably blonde, and you might want to check they’re not entirely heterosexual too, if you know what I mean?  I think you do!  😜 

  10. Back to drafting points.  A few words the comms girls flagged for reconsideration: ‘insects’ (only problematic as used to refer to males, OK in the context of the inmates’ diets), use ‘benefiting’ not ‘suffering’ throughout, ‘developing practical work skills’ not ‘forced labour’ (and omit the reference there to nudity), ‘meditation posts’ for ‘pillories’, ‘step exercise’ not ‘treadmill’, ‘ well-adjusted’ not ‘obedient’, ‘intensive care’ and 'treatments'  not ‘torture’ – and actually, you can lose the entire section describing all the ‘treatments’ recalcitrant offenders can receive in what I’ll call the ‘intensive care’ facilities.  The section must have been fun to write and it was certainly fun to read (not sure I’ve ever been aroused by a legislative draft before 😏) but all of these 'treatments' you describe in such agonising (pun intended!) detail are authorised under the general language of Article 17(d) anyway, so no need to spell it all out. Any male who claims he didn’t realise the meaning of ‘any method the Warden (or any Guard to whom she deputises that decision) considers appropriate’ has only himself to blame when he’s strapped down shrieking to an ‘intensive care’ table for ‘treatments’ !

  11. On the same theme, returning to the budget, have you considered saving 12% on the cost of the ‘intensive care centre’ in the camp (sorry!  old habits!) facility by leaving out the soundproofing? It's already deep underground.  And if any faint sounds do get out, does anyone really mind?  Could be quite ‘educational’ for the other inmates, anyway, hearing a little of what happens if they misbehave.  Incidentally, I understand there will be a VIP viewing area in the first 'facility'.  Looking forward to my invitation to the grand opening!

  12.  Finally, just on how you describe the procedures for the release of rehabilitated prisoners... I'm really going to have to insist here.  Cos the PM herself is a bit annoyed about this one, OK, Tilly? And you know how bad that can be.  Look: she loves your Minister’s commitment to female supremacy and there isn’t a hairs-breadth difference between them on policy matters. But she had to come down hard on this sort of language during the election campaign when your Minister let her enthusiasm run away with her and she’s disappointed to see the same language in this draft.  Once and for all: males on release are ‘Citizens Under Supervision of Responsible Females’ and when they pass from one RF to another a ‘Custodial Acceptance Fee’ is paid.  They are not ‘slaves’ and they are certainly not ‘auctioned off to the highest bidder’.  For Goddess’ sake, can you just get your Minister to read the f***ing memo?

Sorry to come down so hard on that last point.  But the PM was quite insistent.  She was in a foul mood when she left the meeting but I think she took it out on her husband as usual, so the thunderclouds have now cleared and we can all breathe easily again here in the PMO!

More domestically, are you still on for lunch on Sunday? I thought I might tell Mike to prepare a roast – very traditional!  As is the new uniform I bought him, as you’ll see!  Let me know if you’re going to bring George but there should be enough scraps for both of them anyway.

Kiss kiss

Lindy

 

Rt. Hon. Linda Harcourt, GMCG

Special Political Advisor to the Prime Minister

Prime Minister’s Office

10 Downing St

 

 

 I'll be sure to share any follow-ups with you, of course.  Thus far, I have only seen one email with no text except the words "No worries, Lindy: they do look fabulous 😍😍😍 !" and the attachment below.

 


 

27 comments:

  1. Quite so Ma’am. Keep the language positive, not negative, such as Re-education, not punishment. Excellent improvement! Congratulations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Female power.
      Sally.

      Delete
    2. I forgot to mention that we tell men that: “This is for your own good”.

      Delete
    3. It's all good for them. And even better for 'society' properly defined.

      Anyway, if they don't like it why did they vote for it? Those that did. Many of whom even had help from their wives with the pesky postal voting, so I've heard. Anyway, democracy is asking the people what they want and giving it to them good and hard, isn't it?

      Best wishes

      S

      Delete
  2. Grinding the male opponents sounds pretty good! Oh, with just boots? :)
    I’m sure the Lady’s popularity would increase if she started a reeducation program.. as long as it stuck to serving women. SaraE

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sara. The whole purpose is to make men serve women. It’s only up to women to decide how they want to be served. Very juicy thinking.

      Delete
    2. Education, education, education, SaraE. It's the most important thing. Grinding male opponents' faces into the dirt is way down her list of priorities - fifth or even sixth, perhaps. Still, it's a five year democratic womandate, so there's time.

      Best wishes

      S

      Delete
  3. Just brilliant! Think how much she'll achieve in her first 5 year term!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, m. It seems like a long time since I Followed Blindly, but I should do so again. Weren't you and your blog around when this blog began? Seems like a long time.

      Not that I'm saying you're old! But you must be. I am. But I find I'm no wiser.

      Best wishes

      S

      Delete
  4. Most men are naughty and need boot camp, retraining to be gentlemen instead of pigs. Those ladies will get my vote.
    Sally.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I’m signing up for a spanking now! SaraE

      Delete
    2. Quite right, Ms Sally. And for the incorrigible ones, well... they can stay pigs and be treated as such, that's the PM's view. And who's to say she's wrong?

      Best wishes

      S

      Delete
    3. Sign up for the spankings, stay for the brutal re-education regime and profound societal transformation, that's the idea, SaraE. You've completed step 1: well done!

      Best wishes

      S

      Delete
  5. Teach men how to emotionally connect to women. I know I’m sexy and can easily turn men on. However, most of the time I need an emotional connection to get turned on myself. Even if I’m not turned on, I greatly enjoy giving sex to a man I’m emotionally connected with.
    Holly

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see. It’s the joy of giving without expecting something in return.

      Delete
    2. Thank you both. yes indeed, or giving while expecting to get something in return but being spurned and crushed by indifference. Not quite what Ms Holly was talking about there, but it floats my own leaky and unseaworthy boat.

      Best wishes

      S

      Delete
  6. The ladies told me they want to send me to a place where I’ll become more “Domesticated “.
    Hank

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's nice. Lots of cake and soft furnishings, I imagine. Don't hesitate to sign up, will you, Hank? The ladies are expecting you for 'tea' and 'cake' at 4pm.

      Best wishes

      S

      Delete
  7. Men just mostly try to use women. I wonder if they are a lost cause. Send them away to camps, except for a few who give instead of take. I can’t wait.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is true. There is much that is wrong with gender relations in our society but, as an eternal optimist, I profoundly believe it's nothing that a little brutality and tyrannical oppression can't fix. You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.

      Best wishes

      S

      Delete
  8. Great stuff! Ironically, rumour has it that the latest PM is 'on the other side of the coin' so to speak. Still, maybe that puts her in a good place to appreciate the value of a more 'traditional' kind of education?
    spicegrinder

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I've had a quick google and I see what you mean, Mr(?) Grinder. Not sure I really want to be governed by a femsub - I mean, if she's got that so wrong, what else might she have weird ideas about? Quite apart from taxation, fracking, monetary policy, trade relations and diplomacy, I mean, obviously.

      For any 'readers' wondering what spicy is talking about: https://www.gawker.com/politics/does-liz-truss-wear-a-bdsm-day-collar

      Many thanks for the informative comment.

      Best wishes

      S

      Delete
    2. I don't think we'll have to worry about being governed by her for very long and I suspect the number of sadists within tory ranks far outweighs the subs!
      (Mr) spicegrinder

      Delete
    3. Incidentally Servitor, I also produce image captions including loads of Femdom content that I post on imagefap. I have a feeling you might enjoy some of it if you're of a mind to have a look. I have the same user name there.
      Spicegrinder

      Delete
    4. Many thanks Mr Grinder. I shall certainly take a look, as I am often minded to check out Imagefap although rarely allowed. Sometimes I wish the site were titled more subtly, but it does have the advantage of accuracy.

      NB, it appears La Mordaunt may be back in the running. Striding anyway. Interesting times.

      Best wishes

      S

      Delete
  9. Absolute bloomin wonderful! A fabulous peek behind the scenes of the future state. Maybe " constructive engagement facilities" instead of camps. Will have the really air headed males think they are dating facilities. All can be revealed once the legislation has been passed and the camps can get into full swing. Femsup.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Femsup. There are those who try to stand in the way of progress, of course, unfairly spreading rumours about these institutions being places of torture and oppression. Fortunately, the plan is that they should be among the first to have an opportunity to find out for themselves. The Minister is confident they'll change their minds and become vocal, enthusiastic supporters of her policy, once they've spent some time experiencing what actually goes on in the ca - ... in the facilities.

      Best wishes

      S

      Delete