 |
| Oh, you can wait, surely? So selfish... |
 |
| Males often don't listen properly to women. The best thing, I find, when discussing something important, is to concentrate 100% on listening, not speaking. That way, there's less danger of a painful misunderstanding. |
 |
| Accessorise! |
 |
| I wouldn't say 'peaked' exactly. It continued to rise for a bit, then fell off a cliff, so to speak. |
 |
| Christmas Special tomorrow on Contemplating the Divine! What's special about it? Oh, well - the captions are all about Christmas! Like this one, y'know... not that special, I suppose. But then who among us is, apart from the ladies obviously? |
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine a set of long, red-lacquered fingernails tugging on an empty, shaven scrotum - forever."
ReplyDelete- Georgia Orwell, 2024
Indeed. One of my SO's favourite books, as it happens. She said as a young teenager she just read the 'rat cage' scene over and over again.
DeleteMany thanks for commenting.
Best wishes
S
The picture from the "Moutoussi" caption has been used before on this blog... do you remember when? I was looking for the earlier post but couldn't find it.
ReplyDeleteMmmm. I actually don't remember that at all, although it's perfectly possible that I did so. I seem to have downloaded the original photo in July 2021 and I don't think I have a duplicate of it so it seems unlikely...
DeleteI do of course have other photos of dominatrix-styled ladies on catwalks (I mean, who doesn't?) and a great many fashion-related captions, mostly on the 'slaveskin' theme so you could be thinking of one of those?
But if not, it wouldn't be the first time a reader has displayed better memory of the blog than I do. I can be quite forgetful, after all, as my SO often laughingly reminds me (also lazy, stupid, clumsy and disrespectful, among other things, apparently).
Best wishes
S
Maybe the photo has been edited (the woman's face in the Moutoussi caption looks somehow edited) and so the photo's not exactly the same. But the other caption definitely exists - I remember the gist of it. The woman took over a fashion label from the man she is walking; the punchline is that she "not only replaced her predecessor but accessorized him."
DeleteGoodness me, you're right. Beneath contempt. Have you ever considered a career as a search engine?
DeleteLooks like someone reversed the image and (fairly skillfully, compared to the general standard for these things) photoshopped a new head on. So that's why I didn't identify it as a duplicate of the previous image. I don't really like captioning photo-manips (although I think I sometimes have, when a celebrity's face has been stuck onto some sexy pose, typically because I didn't recognise the celebrity), as it just seems like cheating. Easy enough to do a "here's a sweet-looking girl saying vicious and brutal things" if you just stick her head onto a militaristic domme body, for example.
I prefer my previous version. I'd better not remove this one, though, or this exchange in the comments will all look a bit mad...
Incidentally, it also appears that I have two posts titled 'Beneath Contempt'. Oh dear... "Contemplating the Divine... recycling stale ideas since 2016".
Congratulations on your sharp observational skills and attention span!
Best wishes
S
I'll never buy from Moutoussi ever since I found out they don't geld their males in-house. I refuse to pay a mark-up on a male from some ranch in California!
ReplyDeleteQuite right. One must insist on authenticity. Do you know, I saw that a formerly reputable malehide fashion house is now advertising a 'cruelty free' range! Disgraceful - but I cannot imagine any lady with true fashion sense buying it.
DeleteBest wishes
S